Project 2025

[Dill]

(06-18-2024, 09:13 PM)FormerlyBengalRugby Wrote: I am pro choice, with some restrictions, as previously stated, I think. If not, no worries, but that is my position.
It was kicked back to the states, so I guess it depends on what the voters in the state want.
I am not playing future games at guessing what someone may want, only stating my position and where most Americans align themselves, with abortions within the first 15 weeks.

Who's "guessing"?  The Project 2025 people have stated their goals to replace the Dept. of HHS with a "Department of Life," which will be focused on ending abortion, Texas style.  Your stated views on abortion do not align with Texas law. Looks like Project 2025 does not represent your views on this matter, or those of the majority.

At this point, there is no state that allows post-birth "abortions" of any sort. Six and DC have no limits. 14 effectively ban abortion; exceptions for the life of the mother, like Texas', have proved very dangerous for the mother. https://www.axios.com/2022/05/14/abortion-state-laws-bans-roe-supreme-court

If Project 2025 is successful, the nation will be Texas.

(06-18-2024, 09:13 PM)FormerlyBengalRugby Wrote: I agree some abortion pills may be safe, but still will not comment until the exact medications are specified, some the exact side effects and responses can be weighed. To do otherwise is reckless. As we are now seeing with complaints and lawsuits against the covid vaccines.

All that is done in the links I gave you. The waiting is over.  But the issue is how the Project 2025 folks will view abortion pills. Safety concerns are not their motivation for banning them.