07-03-2024, 09:28 PM
(07-03-2024, 09:01 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Everything you list Trump was given immunity; all were done as official acts of his Presidency. Trump's job is to have secure federal elections, he has oversight over the state elections that conduct federal elections.
So that means he should be totally free, as part of his "oversight", to demand votes are found to overthrow the result? Welp.
(07-03-2024, 09:01 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Evidence used in the Bragg case will be tossed based on SC ruling. Hicks and Raffensperger testimony will be tossed upon appeal. Why do you think Marchan agreed to move sentencing? He knows he allowed evidence in the case which should not have been allowed.
I am not a lawyer, but good chance the Bragg trial and conviction is overturned or a mistrial.
It's really hard for me to see why you would consider giving any president the right to interfere with elections a good thing. Guess it would take Biden to just do as Trump did, demand that party friends find him votes in states he would otherwise lose, for you to be actually alarrmed about giving a POTUS that much leeway.