07-03-2024, 11:07 PM
(07-03-2024, 09:57 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: It doesn't. I never said it did. What I am saying is that the language and framing used paint a far grimmer picture than what actually happened.
Maybe so, I don't even contradict it. I just don't care all that much about the narratives surrounding Jan6. The event is as grim as it is, meaning it's still pretty grim, why would I be bothered so much with all alleged or actual liberal framing? Shame on everyone who misuses it, sure, I am aware that happens. But why can't we look at the event itself without constantly mentioning that?
(07-03-2024, 09:57 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: We've had this discussion before regarding things Trump said and how they are blown up or taken out of context. This doesn't need to be done as the actual statements are usually plenty bad on their own. Yet the urge to exaggerate apparently cannot be curbed. You've seen it there, I'm surprised you don't see it here. This makes people tune out, everything becomes hyperbole.
It's not about me not seeing it. It's about me not giving it the same relevance in this instance. To me it is merely a side aspect you insist to focus on. But I can sure repeat it, yeah it gets rhetorically misused, yeah it's contraproductive, no it does not mean that the faulty reactions to the event are even remotely as important or relevant as the events itself, Jan 6 and all the other coup attempts.