02-14-2016, 03:57 AM
(02-13-2016, 09:29 PM)Sovereign Nation Wrote: Naw. Homeschooled ones are too smart to do that.
The question he ask has no merit,
I think asking which police officer would admit he broke the law does have merit. Because that is the standard of proof you are asking for.
Quote:the point is, the whole concept of racial profiling is only coming from a biased side.
Partly, yes. George W. Bush issued the ban on racial profiling by federal law enforcement officials. Did the President ban something which you claim doesn't exist because he was biased?
Quote:Black people making the claim of racial profiling doesn't mean it is actually happening.
No, it doesn't. Many times the accusations are false. But, claims by a closet white supremacist who is too afraid to come out of the closet doesn't mean that it isn't happening, either.
Quote:Blacks crying "racial profiling" are just looking for a reduced sentence, the charges being dropped or a payday in the form of lawsuits.
False accusations of racial profiling are a fact of life. But, to claim that all "blacks" are lying about racial profiling is a stereotype based upon the color of a group's skin rather than judging the facts of each individual case. Hell, even Vlad admits that it happens in rare instances.
Quote:If you were homeshcooled with a good teacher, you would be smart enough to see the flaws in the narrative of racial profiling.
I will never understand people like you. Maybe it is because I believe "All men are created equal" and "Liberty and Justice for all" are more than just words.
