02-29-2016, 06:19 AM
(02-28-2016, 10:49 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Certainly two ways to interpret his actions. Either he was a pervert/jerk (like you're suggesting) or he was trying to show an assumed flaw with the law, which is what I assumed.
Wouldn't you say that if he was a pervert/jerk that his actions would actually support the stance of a flaw with the law?
