03-13-2016, 04:41 PM
(03-13-2016, 04:27 PM)bfine32 Wrote: First of all: Where was the danger to human life in the Oregon standoff? You had a bunch of folks occupying an empty building in the middle of nowhere.
But in the protester's scenario you have people rushing the stage (I know more facts need) and you have people engaging in fights.
Here's the latest on the Oregon standoff charges:
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-oregon-militia-idUSKCN0WB2ZM
Click on the link, hit control f, type in terror and tell how many times it appears. You can then type in danger and tell me how many times it references the occupation being danger to human life.
But this has gone on quite long enough. Enjoy the rest of your Sunday. I'm going to build a table.
People illegally occupying a federal property and threatening violence with deadly weapons if police act on their illegal occupation. That is a danger to human life. I'm trying to ascertain what occurred at the event because I do not know. All I know is someone was a jag and was interrupting, and someone rushed the stage. I have asked what was said, who rushed the stage, if we know why. These things are all necessary for me actually form an opinion. You claim it is hypocritical but I knew more about the Oregon situation when I said what I said than I know about this incident. I don't even know whether the person that rushed the stage was pro or anti Trump.
As for your link, not going to bother. Why? Because often times our government doesn't throw the full weight of the law at people when doing so could risk inciting more to do the same.
(03-13-2016, 04:29 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Oh, I didn't name anyone, just an "if the shoe fits...."
Except, you did. By saying those that called it terrorism were people without integrity. Specifically naming names is not necessary with those qualifiers for it to be a personal insult.
But enjoy building your table.
