The Left At It Again

[GMDino]

(03-13-2016, 11:39 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I did watch the Jimmy Dore video and it appears you should be having a discussion with Pat as you two are at opposite ends. Pat suggests Trump and his security should do more while you and your link suggests the do too much. it seems Trump's campaign has a hard time pleasing anyone that is opposed to him;  obviously not saying you are, just in general. 

I look forward to you and Pat discussing your differences on this issue in a genuine and unbiased manner. 

(03-13-2016, 11:44 PM)bfine32 Wrote: So you and Pat are at odds on this issue as well. Why didn't you bring this up with him?

To look, fairly, if Pat is at odds with anyone let's look and see if he said what you think he said.

(03-13-2016, 06:39 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Oh, well, his choice. He should probably pay for better security.

(03-13-2016, 09:05 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: I honestly don't know. I'm sure they guide the in house security, but apparently that crew didn't do as good of a job vetting guests. 

(03-13-2016, 09:37 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Anyone without a white hood?

Seriously, though, I heard on the news that they often are checking people in line and asking them to leave when they don't "look" right. The huge number of college kids,
particularly minorities, should have tipped them off.

It comes with the territory, though. If you're going to just spread hatred, you're going to have backlash. Instead of playing the victim, he could have had his security team clear out the protestors and continued on. 

It seems he said, clearly, that Drumpf's security should have handled this better by keeping the protesters out before anything started.

But you added the word "forceful" in this next quote.  Perhaps it was to defend Drumpf saying he wishes it was the good old days and you could punch a protester int he face?

(03-13-2016, 10:04 PM)bfine32 Wrote: The hypocrisy comes for blaming him for having his voice silenced through coercion. The security is provided by the venue, but I find it 2 funny that you suggest his security is to blame.

Just so we are clear and don't accidentally confuse you with a hypocrite again: Do you think Trump and his security should be more forceful with these "protester"?

He canceled the event out of fear for the safety of those in attendance. Folks are having a hard time blaming this on Trump; but they are still trying real hard.

Then it goes back to you saying Pat said what you said he said.  Not what he said.

(03-13-2016, 11:52 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Do you want to expound or just go with the insults?

Pat has mentioned in this very thread that Trump should do more in the way of security and you have suggested he is doing too much. 

But I blame me. 

(03-14-2016, 12:20 AM)bfine32 Wrote: I have not "down played" anything, but that was not the question posed. Given that: what about you and Pat disagreeing on what Trump and his security should do makes me "obtuse"?

That was what was "obtuse".  Pat said they should have done a better job.  Others said Drumpf has acted like his security being rough is a good thing and wishes they would/could be rougher.  You said that means Pat wants his security to be rougher which is in opposition of those who said Drumpf's people have been too rough.

(03-14-2016, 12:26 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Hey, let Pat stereotype if he wants. Nobody here has a problem with that.

(03-14-2016, 12:37 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Are you drunk?

Then the "poor me card" came out.

On what actually happened at the event: 

Drumpf WANTS controversy.  It's his best friend because the low educated people he loves will look at it as "the man" taking away his "rights".

And it will be all over the news.

Quite frankly I would not be even slightly surprised to find Drumpf hired the protesters and allowed them in just to make him look like a victim.  It seems to be the right has perfected the art of martyrdom.  (Cite: War on Christmas)