03-17-2016, 02:25 AM
(03-17-2016, 02:19 AM)fredtoast Wrote: This study defines "government benefits" to in include the cost of roads, fire protection, police protection, etc.
I really don't see us cutting the cost of firefighting and building roads if we get rid of all immigrants.
Best I can tell it also assumes that not a single immigrant will earn more than a person with no high school education.
Lot of number twisting to come up with an imaginary number.
Isn't that your chief talking point when debating the size of government and whether I enjoy it's benefits? So when debating me on gov role you say those are legitimate gov benefits but now they aren't legitimate to use in a study?
And we would cut costs on fireman. less population the less staff we need.
