04-12-2016, 08:29 PM
(04-12-2016, 02:28 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: Question for Democrats, since they seem to be the ones ok with abortion because it's a woman's choice.
Say that there's Siamese twins, and they share an organ, but twin A has a majority of it and twin B can't live without A being alive.
Would it be ok for twin A to kill twin B because B can't live without A, just as a baby can't live without the mother? Isn't it the choice of A to live freely without the burden of B?
Extreme example, but please tell me how that logic is flawed.
I applaud your attempt to try to approach the abortion question from a different slant, but it is pretty far fetched. I will say just as in abortions; I could see the merit in choosing a less viable life over another, if the more viable life's health was in jeopardy.
WTS, I'm out; been down this road too many times. I'll leave it to the liberals, they appear to be enjoying themselves.