04-22-2016, 02:30 PM
(04-21-2016, 12:29 PM)Devils Advocate Wrote: Items that were omitted from the OS (official story)
I've seen most of the "evidence" over the years, and there are perfectly logical, rational and independent explanations - with actual good science - if you are willing to accept it.
But like most conspiracy theories, the 9/11 relies heavily on the strawman and, in the case of the quote above, red herrings of omission. The foundation of any good CT is a thousand questions ranging from the impractical, , irrelevant, unreasonable and illogical to the ridiculously absurd....reject any explanation and then claim lack of a satisfactory answer is evidence of a conspiracy.
Honestly, if it was omitted from the "official story", then what proof do we have that what was supposedly "omitted" was real? Or anything more than some nutjob's opinion that it was pertinent enough to be part of abbreviated official "summaries"?
--------------------------------------------------------
