04-24-2016, 05:58 PM
(04-22-2016, 11:04 PM)Beaker Wrote: No its not. Its a classic case of making something fit a narrative after the fact. You could do the same thing by saying something like "looking at visitor sign in logs showed that lots of muslims visited the towers in the two years leading up to the attack, that was plenty of opportunity for them to plant explosives". That's how ridiculous the whole elevator service company as evidence speculation is. Not to mention how stupid the whole inside job speculation is.
Nothing I've presented describes What you're accusing me of.
I have given facts. You guys have only said 'nuh uh'. If anyone here can be accused of fitting the narrative, it's you and a few others. Some of you are even making stuff up.
Besides, your analogy here is just stupid. If you can't figure out why, then I can't help you.
Until any of you present something new ... hell, present anything, that debunks what I've posed, I'll consider the point of ACE elevator company A solid victory for conspiracy analysts.
I will not address ad hominems or Strawman again concerning this point of ACE elevator company. As Sgt Joe Friday famously said 'Just the facts ma'am'. So, piss or get off the pot.
-That which we need most, will be found where we want to visit least.-
