04-26-2016, 05:31 PM
(04-26-2016, 05:22 PM)fredtoast Wrote: No I don't see any difference at all.
If a man wanted to sexually assault a woman in a public restroom he could already dress like a woman and go in the ladies room.
The law changes absolutely nothing.
![Rolleyes Rolleyes](http://yoursmiles.org/tsmile/emb/t1827.gif)
Once again, making things up to fit your narrative.
You might not always be able to tell, but let's say the person is obviously a man with facial hair and just everything that makes it obvious that they're a man.
Now, with this law, he'll be able to do it with no problem. so your assertion that it changes nothing is very incorrect.
(04-26-2016, 05:24 PM)GMDino Wrote: Unless they are not real and merely hypotheticals.Real situations that have not happened yet, not just some hypotheticals that have no chance of actually happening, and that's the difference, but, as I said, it's the typical type of argument that defenders of this would use.
(04-26-2016, 05:24 PM)GMDino Wrote: See above why that is an ironic statement.See above for why it's not.