04-30-2016, 12:43 PM
(04-30-2016, 11:49 AM)GMDino Wrote: Clearly.I was/am Ok with the social norm of males using the men's room and female's using the women's room. Apparently many are not, so they make a law that states you can use whichever facility you want; the state reacts and says no you cannot.
You are okay with women in men's rooms not men in women's rooms...because "uncomfortable" and "safety".
You don't there should be a law allowing it you just "don't care" if it is illegal.
You don't think the examples of women who look like men are good because not EVERYONE looks likes that but you understand there are many situations (an "infinite" amount even) that they can and would happen.
As far as "feeling comfortable" which population do you think is greater: A portion of the 0.3% that feel they need a law allowing them to go where they please or the percentage of people that would be uncomfortable because a dude is in the ladies' room?
As to the "safety" issue. Fred has already shown that transgenders are in bigger danger using the facility opposite their sex or as he said the "right" one (so the "stop it before it starts logic is blown away".). Making it legal will not reduce these assaults and most likely will increase them, but using a facility that matches your sex and charging anyone who violates another in a facility with a hate crime and more severe punishment likely will
But somehow, my logic makes no sense.