04-30-2016, 01:03 PM
(04-30-2016, 11:41 AM)fredtoast Wrote: But it proves he was not the disaster many of you claim. He was better than 2 of the 5 taken before him.
No it doesn't.
Your argument relies on Simpson's performace relative to other receivers in his draft class.
Other players turning out as diasters doesn't negate the fact the Simpson was also a disaster. It only establishes that other receivers were shit. Well, so what? You act as if those receivers were the only alternative.
