05-01-2016, 12:06 PM
(04-30-2016, 09:54 PM)bfine32 Wrote: If you interpret it as him saying there was no need for any law; then I agree with it. If you are saying he is saying there is no need to counter a law that "means nothing" then I disagree with his logic
In other words:
"If you agree with me I agree with it...if not then it is not logical".
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media0.giphy.com/media/1kwsTjL8BNqlszNtnCE/giphy.gif)
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
