05-09-2016, 01:47 PM
(05-09-2016, 01:08 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: http://www.bengals.com/news/article-1/Joseph-100-percent/163521d7-8bc2-4d7e-9ea0-9230c8ff667e
Hobson reported it was a recurring stress fracture, but he just reported if affected a different foot than the 2007 fracture.
No he did not. From the story you linked...
"the pain stretched all the way back to June 2, 2007 during a minicamp practice he originally suffered the break".
It is clear that the injury bwas to the same foot
(05-09-2016, 01:08 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Your article quoted Joseph stating, " The doctors told me I had the option to either have surgery again right then and there once I got cleared to practice" is incorrect. If he needed a second surgery why would the doctors wait until he was cleared to practice? They wouldn't. They would perform the surgery as quickly as possible to get him back on the field as quickly as possible. Could he be cleared for practice if he need a second surgery "right then and there"? No.
The way I took it he was cleared to go back to practice and that is when he noticed the continued pain.
Are you seriously claiming that for some reason JJ was trying to lie about his former injury? Why would he do that? And how can you claim top know more thanthe doctors that actually examined him? That is just ridiculous.
