Texas responds to Obama and his bathroom dream

[GMDino]

(05-17-2016, 11:35 PM)JustWinBaby Wrote: It's not about what the "odds" you think are....like I said, if that was the case people would be fine with unisex locker rooms.  That's not the case.  So stop subjecting people to something they clearly don't want risk of being exposed to.

And all the arguments you just made - covering up, averting your eyes - transgenders are capable of doing that, too.  So the very argument you continue to make for it is a clear argument AGAINST it.  Your argument is entirely lacking in logical consistency.

And "bathroom bill" or "locker room shower" bill is a distinction without a difference.  Those facilities usually are not separate.

Yes, yes they can.

And they do.

They are not in there to stare at your children or you.

They are in there to poop or pee or change their clothes.

There is no shower in the bathroom at McDonald's.  there is distinct difference.

Oh...also it has nothing to do with minimum wage OR the right to discriminate and fire someone because of the sex or which sex they identify with and to deny those same people any legal recourse.

But..."bathroom bill".