05-18-2016, 05:24 PM
(05-18-2016, 05:05 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Because you were replying to me and I made no such claim; but you, as well as the others, most likely knew that.
Obviously anyone that says this attack occured because someone tried to impersonate a trans is introducing a red herring and those that continue to address it are no better.
But you made a claim that something had changed, specifically 'transgender laws'. Still waiting on that law you and your brethren keep referencing. Crickets thus far.
(05-18-2016, 02:26 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I may have missed something but I haven't seen anyone stating the man was claiming to be transgender. I think to point was the man was allowed to freely enter the women's facility due to transgender laws.