Declassified 9/11 Pages

[McC]

(07-15-2016, 05:16 PM)Benton Wrote: The sad part there is, there's about as much evidence suggesting SA was involved as there was that WMD's existed posing some sort of terrorist threat from Iraq that required us going in and removing a foreign leader, dismantling a government and bombing areas.

Wasn't invading Iraq more about GW doing what his daddy wouldn't, which was oust Saddam, and having a base of operations in the Middle East than WMD?  The military wanted to set up over there so they could continue on into Afghanistan and be right there by Iran and the excuse was WMD.


Fifteen of the nineteen hijackers were Saudi Arabian.  Doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to connect those dots.  Pretty appalling, really, the things we tolerate in the name of oil.