Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
With Bridgewater seriously injured, could there be a Mccarron trade?
(08-31-2016, 07:40 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: As already stated in this thread, but I will reiterate, just to strengthen the premise.  Minnesota is not going to overpay for a one year QB, when they have their franchise guy, who happens to be injured for the year.  Secondly, would be very short sighted for the Bengals to auction off McCarron.

In fairness, Sunset, there's absolutely no guarantee that Bridgewater is ready for Week 1 of 2017, and even if he is, there's no guarantee he'll ever look the same. Fully torn ACL, dislocated knee, and "other structural damage". That can easily be well over a year before the player returns to normal, if he ever returns to normal.

So McCarron would be a 2 year QB for them.

As for the whole short-sighted for the Bengals bit, how so? If Dalton goes down for the season, the season is over. Having McCarron isn't going to change that. They're not going to win a SB with McCarron.
____________________________________________________________

[Image: jamarr-chase.gif]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: With Bridgewater seriously injured, could there be a Mccarron trade? - TheLeonardLeap - 08-31-2016, 08:06 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)