Wisconsin Is Systematically Failing to Provide the Photo IDs Required to Vote in Nov

[*bfine32*]

(10-04-2016, 02:09 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: The thing to keep in mind is that even with a flat rate you are looking at something that creates a greater burden on the poor. 1% to someone with a taxable income of $25k is a much greater deal than 1% to someone making $100k when taking into account costs of living.

That being said, the court case precedent is there. IIRC, in all that has gone on, the view has been since that case that the ID will have to be free in order for it to pass judicial scrutiny.

Hell, being poor is a bigger burden than being rich, but just because I take 1% from each doesn't mean someone is being treated unfairly and as I said, the ID will not be "free" just because the one getting it doesn't have to pay for it.