10-05-2016, 05:15 PM
(10-05-2016, 02:32 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: We already do, the military.
Aside from that, you're talking about something provided by the private sector versus the government. And you aren't required to pay a tax/fee for bearing a firearm. Firearms themselves are private property, the ability to have one is your individual liberty (at least since 2010) so as long as the government doesn't tax just your ability to have one, then it's not a violation of the civil liberty.
Like lawyers. Oh wait.
Not that I'm against providing lawyers to people who can't afford them. I think that's a very good thing.
“History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.”-Thurgood Marshall
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
