Wisconsin Is Systematically Failing to Provide the Photo IDs Required to Vote in Nov

[BmorePat87]

(10-05-2016, 07:39 PM)bfine32 Wrote: ...and you are making the leap that, if you are required to present a valid photo ID to vote and if such an ID is not provided for you at someones else's expense, you are being taxed to vote.

Just like the right to bear arms. No one is saying you cannot bear arms/ vote; it's just your personal responsibility to obtain the device necessary to do so.

If you the courts want to compare that to the poll taxes of Jim Crow then it is not the first, and most likely not the last time I question their interpretation on the Amendments. Last time I voted I had to present ID, this ID cost me money; was I taxed to vore?

WTS, I have conceded such a card should be paid for by others free.

Your comments still don't address thesome would be OKood with using tax dollars to provide someone with the tool required to vote, but not the tool required to exercise their right to bare arms

Again, I'm not making the leap, the courts are. If you have to pay the government for a card to vote, you're being taxed. Kentucky allows you to use your Social Security card, which is free, so you can vote free in your state. 

As far as addressing paying for guns, I already did. We have an amendment that says you can't be charged to vote. We don't have an amendment that says you can get guns for free, just that the government can't stop you from owning them (with limitations).