11-17-2016, 08:48 PM
(11-17-2016, 08:30 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Crazy, this is literally the example I was in the process of typing out before I decided to read the rest of the thread first.
The Seahawks got more yards than the Patriots in 2014, but lost the SB because they scored less points. Can you imagine how much everyone would make fun of the Seahawks if afterwards they said "we got more yards, therefor we should have won the SB, I demand a retroactive change in the rules"??? They would be roasted on every forum and new station in existence.
Yards don't equal points in football.
Votes equal votes in elections.
I'm not for this change because it sounds like sour grapes. If someone comes up with a good reason and its approved to change it later that's all well and good.
But a vote is a vote.
A yard is not a point.
More people wanted Clinton than Trump. Trump just had enough people in the right states to win the EC. That's the game.
But I can understand people saying she "won" the country wide vote. You just can't change the rules after you lose.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media0.giphy.com/media/1kwsTjL8BNqlszNtnCE/giphy.gif)
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
