01-31-2017, 12:38 PM
(01-31-2017, 12:30 PM)GMDino Wrote: So she did her job. Thanks.
100% incorrect, as I explained in the post you quoted. The EO is not illegal or unconstitutional on its face. Certain aspects of it will likely be overturned but you don't throw the baby out with the bath water. If you're an AAG with integrity then you defend the aspects of the EO in court that have firm legal footing, i.e. about 90% of it, and explain to the court that you cannot defend the remainder when the topic comes up. You wouldn't state it as plainly as that in court but the gist, and outcome would be the same.
