01-31-2017, 02:21 PM
(01-31-2017, 02:10 PM)GMDino Wrote:![]()
Even during that six month period the current administration keeps citing people were allowed in. It slowed down, but it was not a "ban".
If the current administration explained how they are going to vet immigrants better I suppose I could get on board with that. I suppose have no refugees commit terrorist attacks yet means the current vetting is pretty good already.
But "what if" and "boogey man" get's more attention I suppose.
It only required a relatively small percentage of people to obtain a visa first.
What do you think happened to those who were required to obtain a visa, but didn't and still tried to enter the country? Were they allowed in or not? If it's the latter, then they were BARRED from entering the country.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](http://media1.giphy.com/media/9EmYYw6o9cmsM/giphy.gif)