01-31-2017, 06:20 PM
(01-31-2017, 12:51 PM)PDub80 Wrote: I find it cute and mindbogglingly funny that after this election someone would want to reference "polls" of anything, considering that they couldn't have been more inaccurate. Election results show nothing: zip, zero, zilch in the sense of what is being talked about. Better recheck your thought process on what convinces you your ideas are right about this stuff. Polls![]()
Well, I don't go by emoticons, that is for sure.
As Belsnickel has pointed out, the polls were not innacurate. Election results show that one candidate was preferred over another. They reflect voter priorities. And combined with polls they certainly show something--e.g., if one candidates numbers go up after announcing he is for a ban on all Muslims.
Your alternative seems to be "talking" to different people, a very small and unscientific sample.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)