02-10-2017, 01:18 PM
(02-10-2017, 01:09 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: Pat beat me to it, but yes. The district court never ruled on the legality of the order, they only put a hold on its implementation while it is being reviewed. The DoJ then appealed the halt on the order to the circuit court and that was what their ruling was on. The halts put in place are temporary measures until the overall matter is resolved in the courts, which will take a much longer time. The DoJ, on behalf of the Trump administration, is just trying to claim that the threat to national security is so great by halting the implementation that it should not be done. As of yet, they have been unable to make that argument satisfactorily.
The bigger question is does the litigator and chief understand that?
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media0.giphy.com/media/1kwsTjL8BNqlszNtnCE/giphy.gif)
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
