If Fournette is there at #9, the Bengals Take Him

[BobJones4980]

(03-03-2017, 08:01 AM)Wyche Wrote: Hill sucks....but there wasn't much tape on Burkhead and Gio struggled too.  The line gave up 41 sacks....and has ranked consistently in the lower 1/4 of the league in YPC for the better part of a decade.  This line sucks....and has been overrated in the past.  I don't think Fournettes style will be an asset behind this bunch of turds....especially if you lose Whit and Z. 

Oh I'm not disagreeing with you, this line is shit, I am just of the opinion that it looks even worse with a bad RB. Like I was saying earlier, Free Agency is gonna play a big part in what everyone does including us. Basically with Adrian Peterson and Jamaal Charles out there someone ahead of us may end up with them and not need Fournette, just like we haven't lost Zeitler and Whit yet but if we do that changes things that we need to do in the draft.

(03-03-2017, 12:23 PM)J24 Wrote: I never said hill was a burkhead type of back where the hell did you get that from? We have other major needs right now than RB we need pass rushers and blockers not another RB that early.

Read it again.

I didn't say you did.

What I was pointing out is that you said Burkhead was a different type of RB. I was just pointing out that Hill isn't a Burkhead type RB or a Power RB, He is neither, he is a somewhat in between guy with terrible vision that dances behind the line. 

Just to be clear I was pointing out that Hill didn't fit the mold of either type of guy we were discussing, never insinuated you said Hill was a Burkhead type.