03-26-2017, 12:43 PM
(03-26-2017, 10:48 AM)GMDino Wrote: "Day without women" not the Women's March on Washington
So I'll play Devil's advocate here: 47 years ago she was labeled a terrorist for her actions. If she had been on the other side she would have been called a rebel.
This is a common tactic for terrorist apologists. Equating that her being labeled a terrorist is simply due to the side she was on is par for the course for the Lord of False Equivalency. She's labeled a terrorist because she is one. Planting a bomb in a shopping center with the aim to kill innocent people seems to me to be the very definition of terrorism.
Quote:And she was convicted and served her time until the exchange. With no other terrorist events linked to her. Her worst crime since 1969 seems to be not telling anyone she was convicted and served for an act labeled as terrorism.
No, she lied on her immigration papers. I'm sure you used this exact same argument to defend the Germans who immigrated her after WW2 and omitted the fact they served in the Waffen SS right?
Quote:And she was in the US for 20 years without so much as a run in with the law? Boy she must be a terrible terrorist.
I'll return to the above analogy. Many of the German immigrants lived entire full lives as US citizens, raising families and obeying the law. So I'm sure you made the same argument for them every time one got caught right?
