05-01-2017, 10:15 AM
(05-01-2017, 04:15 AM)Dill Wrote: LOL, you know, I had the same Deja vu.
Normally once you explain that a critique of some statistician's sample is no critique if the critic cannot even specify what was sampled and how, you can at least get the critic to take a closer look, maybe even provide the required specification, or grant he has made an error.
But "I've already addressed that" is total fail as a response. It could deflect further inquiry, though, if keeping some desired belief unchallenged is the goal.
![[Image: 18157421_1638024282892677_1528731701955746756_n.jpg]](https://s30.postimg.org/5911s2r2p/18157421_1638024282892677_1528731701955746756_n.jpg)
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media0.giphy.com/media/1kwsTjL8BNqlszNtnCE/giphy.gif)
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.