With Merkel's Foes in Disarray, Germany Defies the Trump Trend

[Sociopathicsteelerfan]

(05-01-2017, 04:15 AM)Dill Wrote: LOL, you know, I had the same Deja vu.

Sorry to interrupt your make out session.  I suppose when you have no answers the best course of action is to engage in a self congratulatory circle J. 

Quote:Normally once you explain that a critique of some statistician's sample is no critique if the critic cannot even specify what was sampled and how, you can at least get the critic to take a closer look, maybe even provide the required specification, or grant he has made an error. 

The issues was specifically addressed.  I'll reiterate what I said to GMDabo, since apparently you need person specific points.  I explained my issue with the methodology, you disagree with my assertion.  No problem, you certainly have that right.  Why you and your parrot can't let it go is a bit odd, but to each their own.

Quote:But "I've already addressed that"  is total fail as a response. It could deflect further inquiry, though, if keeping some desired belief unchallenged is the goal. 

Or it could be the response of someone who gets tired of endlessly repeating themselves to posters determined to ignore points made.  Your desperation in this thread is palpable.  You're not even trying to address anything now.  I suppose getting busted plagiarizing and not citing your sources took the fun out of it for you?

(05-01-2017, 10:15 AM)GMDino Wrote:

Lord jpg unwittingly makes his little buddy look bad.  Like I said above, your outrage is always predicated on the person committing the act, never the act itself.  Inconsistent morality is a very unappealing character trait.