It's Draft Time: Impeachment Edition

[hollodero]

(05-18-2017, 11:10 AM)michaelsean Wrote: OK then that would make it meaningless in my book.  If the person having the conversation also concluded he could not at the very least derive intent, or more likely recognized there was no intent, then I don't think you have anything to go on.

I don't think it's meaningless just because it's not verifiable by a third witness. If it is as portrayed, it's not a sole reason for a conviction. But it's still reason for additional suspicion.

I agree though, Comey's word might not be enough for an actual impeachment. The sum of things, however, that's a different picture. (Probably still not enough, though, but what do I know.)