05-18-2017, 11:36 AM
(05-18-2017, 11:17 AM)hollodero Wrote: I don't think it's meaningless just because it's not verifiable by a third witness. If it is as portrayed, it's not a sole reason for a conviction. But it's still reason for additional suspicion.
I agree though, Comey's word might not be enough for an actual impeachment. The sum of things, however, that's a different picture. (Probably still not enough, though, but what do I know.)
With the current makeup of the House, there's no way you get impeachment. If things turn over drastically in 2018, then maybe impeachment, but very little chance of conviction. Unless something proves he absolutely attempted to interfere with the investigation.
“History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.”-Thurgood Marshall
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)