Convention of States: Good or Bad?

[BmorePat87]

There seems to be some misunderstanding of Matt's historically accurate depiction of the 2nd Amendment, whether knowingly or not. With regards to the 2nd Amendment debate, any judicial precedent prior to Heller (2008) presented it as a state's right to have an armed militia in defense of an overreaching government, not as an individual's right to own a firearm. The concept doesn't translate perfectly today, hence much confusion and many willfully ignoring the militia clause. Another reason why a Constitution written in the context of today is necessary.