Trump admin rescinds Obamacare hhs contraceptive mandate

[*bfine32*]

(10-06-2017, 02:34 PM)Au165 Wrote: 1) That becomes a country responsibility when they are funneled into the assistance programs. Why is it those same health care plans still cover Viagra? Shouldn't they only cover Viagra to people who are married based on their religious beliefs?

2) Next question, what about the fact that birth control is also a medication that is used to treat heavy menstrual flow? Do we need to ban any drugs being covered that lower sperm count in men as a side effect? That could also be interpreted as a form of birth control.

1). I suppose it is because ED is a medical condition (or so I've been told). By your standards if a pregnancy occurs as a result of the male taking Viagra then the employer should pay for child care.

2) If heavy menstrual flow is a condition that requires treatment and oral contraceptive is the only method of treatment then it should be authorized and I would be mad with you if it were not.

Once again you are pointing to a drain on society "funneled into the assistance programs". That is not an employers responsibility.