11-01-2017, 02:45 PM
(11-01-2017, 02:07 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: 1. We agree on more vetting.
2. We should be enforcing the laws. We should also curb entrance into this country at least while we sort through the millions of illegals who are who have been running around unchecked for decades.
Again, how are we going to enforce new rules when you claim we aren't enforcing the ones we currently have?
Quote:3. Quotas slow the flow of new immigrants. As I have said it’s necessary while we clean up the illegals currently here..... if we want to be able to adequately sort them out and even possibly giving them a chance to be legal we need to lessen the burden from people coming.
Quotas would only affect those immigrating legally much like conservatives claim gun control laws would only affect law abiding citizens.
Quote:4. So only white people live Europe now? The world is different and by restricting to 3% non whites are not being short changed. This coupled with a point system we will get the best people. And give enforcement a Chance to work.
I never claimed only White people live in Northern Europe. But, there is an increased concentration of white Protestants in Northern Europe compared to Japan for instance. If we applied your proposed 3% quota to Northern Europe and Japan "equally" so as not to discriminate based upon race (because after all this is the home of the brave and the land of the free) because there are more people in America of Northern European descent than Japanese descent more visas will be issued to immigrants coming from Northern Europe. Since Northern Europe has more Whites and less Asians (and Japan has less Whites and more Asians) more White Northern Europeans will be granted visas compared to visas issued to Japanese immigrants. The more White Northern European immigrants that get in the greater the number of visas which will be granted to that area in the future. The fewer Japanese immigrants granted visas will conversely decrease the number of visas issued in the future.
Quote:5. It was 2% and later raised.
Just because it was raised to 3% doesn't make it any less arbitrary.
Quote:6. We were better off with a restricted immigration. We have had an influx of restricted immigration and open immigration throughout history. We just need about 10-15 years of restriction to sort out all these illegals.
This is nothing but opinion. I want to see objective data demonstrating we were better off in 1924 compared to 2017.
