Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Zarate Not Guilty
#4
(11-30-2017, 10:20 PM)treee Wrote: Why would it cause a riot? Why is it surprising that a jury found a ricocheting bullet not to be intentional killing? Maybe the prosecutor should have went for manslaughter instead.

Well this was a case filled with emotion as the suspect was a felon that many thought should not have been in the country. Wonder what he was shooting at that caused the bullet to ricochet?

It is exactly as the Freddie Gray case. DA over-charged and that one caused riots if memory serves.  
[Image: bfine-guns2.png]

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]





Messages In This Thread
Zarate Not Guilty - bfine32 - 11-30-2017, 10:11 PM
RE: Zarate Not Guilty - Belsnickel - 11-30-2017, 10:18 PM
RE: Zarate Not Guilty - bfine32 - 11-30-2017, 10:25 PM
RE: Zarate Not Guilty - JustWinBaby - 12-01-2017, 01:26 AM
RE: Zarate Not Guilty - Benton - 12-01-2017, 01:57 AM
RE: Zarate Not Guilty - GMDino - 12-01-2017, 10:09 AM
RE: Zarate Not Guilty - JustWinBaby - 12-01-2017, 01:23 PM
RE: Zarate Not Guilty - treee - 11-30-2017, 10:20 PM
RE: Zarate Not Guilty - bfine32 - 11-30-2017, 10:24 PM
RE: Zarate Not Guilty - CKwi88 - 11-30-2017, 10:36 PM
RE: Zarate Not Guilty - jason - 12-01-2017, 12:57 PM
RE: Zarate Not Guilty - Belsnickel - 11-30-2017, 10:53 PM
RE: Zarate Not Guilty - mallorian69 - 12-01-2017, 12:25 AM
RE: Zarate Not Guilty - Belsnickel - 12-01-2017, 10:00 AM
RE: Zarate Not Guilty - GMDino - 12-01-2017, 10:05 AM
RE: Zarate Not Guilty - Dill - 12-01-2017, 10:58 PM
RE: Zarate Not Guilty - GMDino - 12-01-2017, 10:02 AM
RE: Zarate Not Guilty - Belsnickel - 12-01-2017, 10:36 AM
RE: Zarate Not Guilty - Benton - 12-01-2017, 01:07 PM
RE: Zarate Not Guilty - Nebuchadnezzar - 12-01-2017, 02:19 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)