02-15-2018, 12:13 PM
(02-15-2018, 11:12 AM)fredtoast Wrote: The Constituttion does not keep us from regulating dangerous activity. I think we have been over this already.
Outstanding Fredtoast response, trying to answer a question without actually answering it. We all know the answer you should have given is "yes", just man up and admit you said something incorrect, yet again.
(02-15-2018, 11:16 AM)fredtoast Wrote: No contradiction at all. I don't trust police, but at the same time I realize that they are necessary. That is why I am in favor of more regulations on police activity.
I have also never said that the government never abuses its power. Again, that is why I am in favor of strong regulation.
Want to address what I have really said instead of just making up strawmen to knock down?
I just did address what you said, I don't trust the government not to abuse that type of registry, especially not at the state level. Hence, my complete opposition to it.
(02-15-2018, 11:20 AM)fredtoast Wrote: I am not ignorant of these laws at all. In fact in one of the gun threads I addressed making these laws universal and I believe you were the one who whined about them. (could have been someone else).
"Whined", so sadly typical. Attempting to paint your opponents as childish and ignorant is a typical tactic of yours. Interesting though, that you claim to know about these laws, made a thread about wanting to make them "universal" and then typed a response to one of my points in which you said gun owners could just lie and say their guns were stolen when law enforcement attempts to confiscate them. You spout so much crap you clearly have a hard time keeping track, hence your constant contradictions. You think for a lawyer you'd be able to keep your lies straight.
Quote:Glad we both acknowledge that gun owners take advantage of lax regulation in order to transfer guns illegally and then avoid prosecution by just reporting them stolen. Too bad only 9 states have done something about it so far.
Another typical Fredtoast response, respond to an argument your opponent didn't make. You do realize we all know you do this and that it doesn't work, right?
(02-15-2018, 11:24 AM)fredtoast Wrote: Hopefully the word "context" will show up on your "word of the day" calendar soon.
When you understand "context" you will understand the difference between this
and this....
I'd suggest you choose your words more appropriately then counselor. As a lawyer you should know this. Say what you really mean. For example, the Constitution is a legal document, yes or no?
