02-20-2018, 08:54 PM
(02-20-2018, 05:05 PM)michaelsean Wrote: So what did they base the original uncostitutionality on? I thought so far gerrymandering has been upheld.
Secondly, I'd say it's one thing for a court to say, "Do it again", versus them doing it themselves.
There are some rules, but usually the rulings are partisan. This story highlights the opinion of the court regarding how the map violate PA's constitution.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/pennsylvania-supreme-court-gerrymandering_us_5a7b8f9de4b08dfc92ffcb68
the reason for the court issuing a map is that the state legislature and governor failed to agree on a replacement before the deadline.
![[Image: ulVdgX6.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/ulVdgX6.jpg)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)