Is the swingman retiring?

[GMDino]

(03-12-2018, 11:13 AM)michaelsean Wrote: Both were.  Amendments are original intent, so they can't go against original intent.  

That doesn't sound logical.

Why would someone be an "originalist" and then agree with changes?  That doesn't sound like something people who claim to like the "originalists" would like.

They seem to want the Constitution applied as "originally" written...not as changes have been made.

Nor do they like new "interpretations" even though all we have is interpretations.  So if a new interpretation is that blacks/slaves no longer count as 3/5 that would not be original.  Nor would adding prohibition.  Then getting rid of prohibition.

Original is original: The way the founding fathers "meant" it to be.