Is the swingman retiring?

[GMDino]

(03-12-2018, 11:31 AM)michaelsean Wrote: Well if you went against decades of decisions because you thought they weren't based on the constitution, then that would still be originalism.  We certainly have to interpret the constitution to modern times, but it should still be based on the constitution.  If you just say "Well the constitution was written a long time ago so it's worthless" then you better write a new one (matt) or you have no basis in law for anything.  Including the parts you like.

Which gets into originalist vs intentionalist I guess.