03-12-2018, 12:29 PM
(03-12-2018, 12:21 PM)Au165 Wrote: So if we amend it to end amendments we are doing as they designed right? We are using their process to adjust as a perceived need arouse. I think you have stretched the term original intent a little far here.
You think including amendments as part of original intent is stretching it? I'm speaking of a more liberal way of viewing the constitution than you at this point. I'm saying original intent is that we change the constitution as we deem necessary through the amendment process. How are you arguing against that?
“History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.”-Thurgood Marshall
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
