Is the swingman retiring?

[Au165]

(03-12-2018, 01:13 PM)michaelsean Wrote: No they intended for us to change the document as we see fit albeit through an arduous process so that ridiculous examples like yours don't get through.  

I'll add that  anyone who doesn't believe in the amendments because they weren't in the very original writing (despite amending being in the original writing) is a moron.

It doesn't matter how ridiculous it is (not really that ridiculous in a party based power grab actually), based on your explanation it creates a paradox that positions your argument of original intent against itself.

That's not what is being said. You have taken this into the weeds, but let's talk more about the moron thing. Explain the paradox above using the logic you have used in establishing original intent.