Is the swingman retiring?

[BmorePat87]

(03-12-2018, 01:17 PM)michaelsean Wrote: I just try to use a common sense deduction.  The second amendment.  One group says we should be able to own drones armed with hellfire missiles, and the other side says we should be limited to the weapons that were available when it was written.  

But then one group says it was originally intended to protect states and allow them to form and regulate militias, and another group says it only allows the ownership of firearms. 

We gotta trust the judges. 

Quote:The problem is attempting to be consistent.  I have no trouble assuming an Air force fits within the context of the Constitution.  I do not believe abortion does.  How can i say one without the other?  To me it seems reasonable.  

The 9th Amendment protects rights not specifically enumerated in the Constitution.