03-14-2018, 07:40 PM
(03-14-2018, 07:15 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Just making sure you realize that you just agreed with me.
Racism can exist without oppression.
Sure. Why would you assume I was disagreeing?
(03-14-2018, 07:19 PM)fredtoast Wrote: You say you disagree, but you are actually agreeing with me again.
Judging an individual based on a stereotype of his race is wrong.
When I see the term "judging" used in this context I believe most people see this as a negative action. I was pointing out that this can exist with "positive stereotypes" as well. I am curious, and know you won't answer, but why didn't you address the point I made about your racist assumption based on a "positive stereotype"? You made a racist statement, I hope unwittingly, and I pointed that out. Why would you ignore that?
(03-14-2018, 07:21 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Sorry, but I am a little confused here.
what is the correct definition of racism and what is the "far left's" definition.
How exactly are they different?
You're not confused and you know exactly what I'm talking about. The alternative is that you just woke up from a four year long coma. As for the correct definition, I'm surprised you'd even ask that as you just agreed, in one of your many posts responding to my single post, that we agreed on the definition of the word.
As for the "far left's" definition, it was adequately stated by Phil and addressed by me, again in a post you quoted, that they believe institutional power used by the ethnicity in control of that power is necessary for a person to be a racist. I'll give you an example to clear you confusion.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/dear-white-people-director-and-star-break-down-why-black-people-cant-be-racist_us_59230aa8e4b094cdba5615fc
Please note the title of the article. Also, please note the fondness of one of your internet friends for using the same exact source for their posts.
I do hope you're no longer confused.
