07-18-2018, 12:16 PM
(07-17-2018, 11:25 PM)Dill Wrote: So a "rational person" could not even change a vote because of this incident, not to mention the many leading up to it and those still to come?Dude, above is the question you posed. You clearly asked someone to look at this single incident, by excluding them with "not to mention". When it was answered you moved the goalpost and continue to do so
rational=passive with respect to Trump's behavior? Sounds like the #1 problem in US politics is still people who exaggerate Trump's behavior--not Trump's behavior.
(07-18-2018, 12:03 PM)Dill Wrote: This is not an either/or. It is easy to imagine more than one scenario built around ONE INCIDENT. Don't you do that automatically with questions like this?So your question was answered and when you found you could not take fault with the answer provided, you chose to reframe your question.
But to answer your question: Yes. I generally try to answer questions as they are posed, not how the sender whats me to answer.
![[Image: bfine-guns2.png]](https://i.ibb.co/YBkDQJV/bfine-guns2.png)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)