Helsinki--the Tipping Point?

[Dill]

(07-18-2018, 12:16 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Dude, above is the question you posed. You clearly asked someone to look at this single incident, by excluding them with "not to mention". When it was answered you moved the goalpost and continue to do so

So your question was answered and when you found you could not take fault with the answer provided, you chose to reframe your question. 
But to answer your question: Yes. I generally try to answer questions as they are posed, not how the sender whats me to answer. 

Sure, I CLEARLY posed a question about this one incident, and you CLEARLY answered by stating a general principle--no rational person would change a vote because of one incident.

Then I CLEARLY "re-framed" the question to refute that principle, which I could and did "take fault with." That is not moving the goal posts. It is removing the ground from your point. Clearly rational people can change their vote because of one incident.