Good Night Irene

[*bfine32*]

(08-17-2018, 09:45 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: So I am compelled to accept a nonsensical argument from you and am not allowed to dismiss it? This reminds me of a week ago when you said that we had to accept Trump's argument that you have to show your ID when you go to the grocery store in his attempts to defend a nonsensical argument.

You're saying I am focusing on the trees and not the forest, but your trees are palm trees, far away from the forest.

You are not compelled to accept anything and can ridicule what ever you want. The analogy was clearly explained, It was to refute a "sensical" assertion that one only disagrees with the act because one cannot disagree with the cause. I clearly (at least I thought) explained that in post 118.

As to your introducing argument from other threads; that's pretty much something you have patented; but it seldom leads to constructive dialog in the current thread. Why not leave those discussions in those threads? 

I can only assume that last line made sense to you.