08-21-2018, 09:44 AM
(08-17-2018, 09:54 PM)bfine32 Wrote: You are not compelled to accept anything and can ridicule what ever you want. The analogy was clearly explained, It was to refute a "sensical" assertion that one only disagrees with the act because one cannot disagree with the cause. I clearly (at least I thought) explained that in post 118.
As to your introducing argument from other threads; that's pretty much something you have patented; but it seldom leads to constructive dialog in the current thread. Why not leave those discussions in those threads?
I can only assume that last line made sense to you.
(08-21-2018, 09:39 AM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Most people are going to ridicule a comparison between kneeling and exposing genitals. It lacked any basis for which a constructive dialogue could even exist. You went into the realm of the absurd and you defended it repeatedly by telling me that I am focusing on the trees rather than the forest, presumably because that made sense to you.
"I didn't say that"...classic.
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.